Branches
Comments
[»]
Openntpd Server mode
by broccoli - Jan 22nd 2005 02:38:21
I really hate the ntp.org reference implementation..
I was glad to see openntpd, but i looks like i'm to stupid to configure
the ntpd:
I set 'listen on $external_ip' in ntpd.conf. It binds to port 123 (netstat
-lnp & lsof) but it does not reply to requests sent by other servers,
even 'nmap -sU -p 123' fails.
(and ntpd --help segfaults on solaris ;-) )
Hmm?
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Openntpd Server mode
by Darren Tucker - Feb 4th 2005 20:47:31
> I set 'listen on $external_ip' in
> ntpd.conf. It binds to port 123 (netstat
> -lnp & lsof) but it does not reply
> to requests sent by other servers, even
> 'nmap -sU -p 123' fails.
>
> (and ntpd --help segfaults on solaris
> ;-) )
Some servers (eg the reference implementation) won't sync to a server that
doesn't set the precision field, which openntpd didn't. I don't know why
nmap doesn't work, though.
The segfault was my fault, I didn't initialize __progname in the compat
library for platforms that don't have a real __progname.
Both of those have been fixed in the snapshots
and will be fixed in the next release.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
This is not an NTP daemon
by Jonas Bofjall - Dec 8th 2004 02:04:20
I would like to issue a warning here: It seems like this is does not
conform to the full NTP protocol at all and it nothing but a simple SNTP
daemon, of which there are many. It is false marketing and the
documentation conveniently skips mentioning it. I feel let down by the
otherwise so skillful programmers behind this. After spending a lot
of time trying to install and understand this software I suspected this and
search the web for references. Turns out Brad Knowles has a
few things to say about openntpd. Be warned that if you use SNTP
instead of NTP and the server clock breaks down, all your time will be
compromised.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: This is not an NTP daemon
by Darren Tucker - Dec 12th 2004 05:48:13
> Turns out Brad Knowles has a few things
> to say about openntpd.
Some of the issues raised by Brad have been resolved in the development
tree a while ago and are now resolved in 3.6.1p1. Some of the other
comments are arguable or misleading.
I have posted a (long) response
to most of the issues raised.
[reply]
[top]
|