Branches
Comments
[»]
Test on V1.16
by mcoon - Jun 25th 2007 10:43:21
After testing on the last version, 1.15, I was emailed by the project lead
that there was a newer version availble. This version turned out to be able
to complete all of its examples (tho logs for example 9 of 13 suggest it
might not be working). The benchmark which didn't run at all on the last
version ran with 2 of three tests completing. All in all, a much better
showing. I'm going to go ahead and install this product.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Usability and quality
by mcoon - Jun 22nd 2007 14:36:07
An interesting product which manages to do some of what CORBA does
without the complexity. As an ACE+TAO user, I can appreciate the utility of
using this product to do some of the simpler tasks.
The software package unpacks, configures, and builds without a hitch on
FC4. It doesn't seem to have any silly requirements and its build
environment is dead simple. The first thing I tried to do with it was to
run the benchmarks in the examples directory. Unfortunately several things
beyond the basic connectivity failed, such as publish and subscribe.
After the above failure, I decided to run tests. Hmm... tests don't
exist. Ok, so a few more of the examples. There are 13 examples, I tried
benchmark (failed), example 1 (succeeded), example2 (succeeded), example3
succeeded, example4 (indirect messages) succeeded, example5 (unsolicited
messages) failed, example6 (Network Conversation) failed, example7
(request/reply messages) succeeded, example8 (cluster with failover)
succeeded, example9 (publish/subscribe) failed, example10 (store and
foreword) succeeded, example11 (structured network messages) worked,
example12 (memory channel) worked, example13 (distributed lock manager)
worked.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Usability and quality
by Riccardo Pompeo - Jun 24th 2007 08:38:48
Benchmark.cpp fails due to a bug in FileTransfer.cpp module only under
Linux. Now the current download (1.16) containts the correct version of
FileTransfer.cpp.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Usability and quality
by Riccardo Pompeo - Jun 24th 2007 08:50:51
I tested example5 and example6 and work well under SuSE Desktop 10.1.
The correct usage is:
Run server: ./examples/example5
Run client: ./examples/example5 localhost
Run server: ./examples/example6
Run client: ./examples/example6 localhost
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Usability and quality
by Riccardo Pompeo - Jun 24th 2007 12:56:29
I tested also example9 and work well under SuSE Desktop 10.1.
The correct usage is:
Run server: ./examples/example9
Run client: ./examples/example9 localhost
[reply]
[top]
|
