Branches
Comments
[»]
still active?
by jeroenvg - Oct 31st 2007 17:57:33
i noticed this project did not get updated since 2005. is it still being
developed? abandoned? are there up to date alternatives available?
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: still active?
by Manuel Lemos - Oct 31st 2007 18:19:56
> i noticed this project did not get
> updated since 2005. is it still being
> developed? abandoned? are there up to
> date alternatives available?
No, it is just there have not been any more features to add or bugs to fix
because the class does practically all it is needed.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
False negatives with this tool
by jganders - Dec 6th 2005 10:27:24
Not sure why, but I'm getting false negatives for all emails at a
particular domain. Does the mail server at a given location have to be
running sendmail for this class to work? Maybe Windows mailservers dont
work? I dont know what platform is running the mailserver giving the false
negatives. Can a sysadmin do something to hide an email server from the
communication that this class utilizes?
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: False negatives with this tool
by Manuel Lemos - Dec 6th 2005 11:06:45
> Not sure why, but I'm getting false
> negatives for all emails at a particular
> domain. Does the mail server at a given
> location have to be running sendmail for
> this class to work? Maybe Windows
> mailservers dont work? I dont know what
> platform is running the mailserver
> giving the false negatives. Can a
> sysadmin do something to hide an email
> server from the communication that this
> class utilizes?
The class just emulates the operation of a normal mail server.
Many mail servers are using grey listing now. The class was updated some
time ago to consider of unknown validity the addresses served by servers
that employ grey listing. I wonder if you are using an updated version of
the class. If you are, can you tell me what e-mail addresses you are
getting false positives?
[reply]
[top]
|
